Progressive Calendar 10.12.05 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: David Shove (shove001![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:27:37 -0700 (PDT) |
P R O G R E S S I V E C A L E N D A R 10.12.05 1. Roseville candidates 10.12 7pm 2. AI StPaul 10.12 7:30pm 3. Eagan peace vigil 10.13 4:30pm 4. Small is beautiful 10.13 5pm 5. Park board forum 10.13 6:30pm 6. Traffic management 10.13 6:30pm 7. DU bombs 10.13 7pm 8. What is MnSOAWatch? 10.13 7pm Northfield MN 9. Katrina teach-in 10.13 7pm 10. Super vision/theatre 10.13 8pm 11. Cuban five/CTV 10.13 8:30pm 12. John M Kelley - The death of the middle class 13. Manuel Garca Jr - Industrialized greed produces pandemics 14. Bill Willers - The rightwing road to America's privatized future 15. Mike Whitney - Bunker days with Reichsfuhrer George 16. Mark Weisbrot - Good news at last! The IMF has lost its influence 17. Mike Whitney - George Bush and the Four Horsemen 18. Gary S Corseri - Whose freedom do we mean? (poem) --------1 of 18-------- From: Amy Ihlan <amy [at] amyihlan.org> Subject: Roseville candidates 10.12 7pm The League of Women Voters will havea Roseville City Council Candidate Forum at 7pm this Wednesday, October 12, at the Roseville City Hall Council Chambers. Members of the audience will be able to submit questions for the candidates. Please come! It should be an interesting event. [Three candidates - Ihlan, Kough, and Anderson - are opposed to the insane $80 million plus Twin Lakes corporate welfare big box misdevelopment. All the others support this travesty. The battle lines are drawn. The city council has 5 members, elected on a staggered basis. The two holdovers are for misdevelopment. So it will take election of all THREE to stop this money grab. I live in Roseville and have watched this utterly undemocratic procedure-flouting coup; the suits do their little soft-shoe dance, and the majority of the council watches them like deer hypnotized by headlights. Corporate corruption of the community is alive and well in Roseville. -ed] --------2 of 18-------- From: Gabe Ormsby <gabeo [at] bitstream.net> Subject: AI StPaul 10.12 7:30pm There are several local Amnesty International groups in the Twin Cities area. All of them are welcoming and would love to see interested people get involved -- find the one that best fits your schedule or location: AIUSA Group 640 (Saint Paul) meets Wednesday, October 12th, at 7:30 p.m. Mad Hatter Teahouse, 943 West 7th Street, Saint Paul. http://www.aistpaul.org --------3 of 18-------- From: Greg and Sue Skog <skograce [at] mtn.org> Subject: Eagan peace vigil 10.13 4:30pm CANDLELIGHT PEACE VIGIL EVERY THURSDAY from 4:30-5:30pm on the Northwest corner of Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle Road in Eagan. We have signs and candles. Say "NO to war!" The weekly vigil is sponsored by: Friends south of the river speaking out against war. --------4 of 18-------- From: Jesse Mortenson <jmortenson [at] Macalester.edu> Subject: Small is beautiful 10.13 5pm 10.13 5pm Cahoots coffeehouse Selby 1/2 block east of Snelling in StPaul Limit bigboxes, chain stores, TIF, corporate welfare, billboards; promote small business and co-ops, local production & self-sufficiency. --------5 of 18-------- From: Dorie Rae Gallagher <hoboanne [at] velotel.com> Subject: Park board forum 10.13 6:30pm There will be a PARK BOARD Forum/Debate October 13 6:30pm at the Minnehaha United Methodist Church. 3701 East 50th Street Minneapolis --------6 of 18-------- From: Anne Carroll <carrfran [at] qwest.net> Subject: Traffic management 10.13 6:30pm Please pass this message far & wide - and please attend! A group of orgs and individuals is working hard to make this visit successful - and for it to have long-term impact on street reclaiming and pedestrian safety. Both sessions should be invigorating, and give individuals a way to impact their environment, rather than expecting others (such as city engineers) to solve everything. The Saturday session will lead to, amongst other things, the formation of working groups. Jun-Li Wang Community Organizer / Community Leadership Coordinator Hamline Midway Coalition 1564 Lafond Avenue St. Paul, MN 55104 Phone: 651-646-1986 Fax: 651-641-6123 www.hamlinemidwaycoalition.org Tired of dodging traffic? On major roads? On your very own block? Find out how to make streets better for you and your family. Free workshop with David Engwicht, an expert on creating friendly streets and the author of "Mental speed bumps: the smarter way to tame traffic." Part one: Thursday, October 13, 6:30-8:30pm on how every person can change a street. Part two: Saturday, October 15, 8:30am-12:30pm for a hands-on session to create safe streets, using Snelling Avenue as a model. Both events at Hamline University, Law Grad Conference Center, St. Paul. For information: Contact the Midway TMO: 651-644-5108; rstark [at] universityunited.com or www.universityunited.com/midwaytmo For more on David Engwicht: see: www.mentalspeedbumps.com/ David Engwicht.turns conventional thinking upside down and maps out a creative and highly effective plan to create people-friendly streets. He advocates giving streets back to people, moving away from the top-down, engineering-led world, and exploiting the power of the mind and the imagination to redefine what streets should be used for. This is powerful stuff and it works. Professor John Whitelegg, Professor of Sustainable Development, University of York, UK. --------7 of 18-------- From: Lydia Howell <lhowell [at] visi.com> Subject: DU bombs 10.13 7pm Thur Oct 13: U.S. Uranium WMDs @ May Day Books Called "bunker busters", the U.S. has dropped hundreds of tons of these delpleted uranium (DU) weapons during the two wars in Iraq. At least, 50,000 American veterans from the 1991 Gulf War have since died of "Gulf War Syndrome" (aka: cancer) and the leukemia rate in Iraq is 12 times higher than it was before DU bombing. Iraq's air, water and soil are contaminated by radiation, with both U.S. soldiers' and Iraquis' children experiencing escalated birth defects. The VA refuses to test returning veterans for radiation poisoning. Hear John LaForge of Nukewatch reveal what the Pentagon continues to deny about these American WMDs. FREE. Thur Oct 13, 7pm, May Day Books, 301 Cedar Ave.S. (basement Hub Bicicycle,door frwy side of bldg), West Bank, Minneapolis For info call Veterans for Peace (612)821-9141 (Lydia Howell) --------8 of 18-------- From: mnsoaw [at] circlevision.org Subject: What is MnSOAWatch? 10.13 7pm Northfield MN MnSOAWatch - get the word out Thursday October 13 at 7pm Cannon Valley Friends Meeting 333 1/2 Division St (above Jenkins Jewelers) Northfield, MN Our GET THE WORD OUT multi-media presentation is geared to those who are new to this issue. The program includes images, portions of a video, real prisoners of conscience, witnesses from delegations to Central and South American countries and legislative efforts. We hope to educate about what the SOA/WHINSEC is and encourage people to participate in the campaign to get it closed. Let your friends know who are curious and would like to learn more, We have two more dates pending- we will email the times as they become solidified. Seats are still available on the Veterans for Peace, Chapter 27 bus for the SOAW vigil in Georgia. Leaving the Twin Cities Friday morning November 18 and then leaving Columbus on Sunday evening. Call Jim at 612.722.1112 to reserve your spot. --------9 of 18-------- From: Amy Porter <port0135 [at] umn.edu> Subject: Katrina teach-in 10.13 7pm The Institute for Advanced Study and the Interdisciplinary Center for the Study of Global Change present: Teach In: Reflections on Hurricane Katrina "Report on Local Organizations and Katrina Relief Efforts" Donna Bauer, President, Minnesota Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster Relief "Implementing Katrina Response in Louisiana and International Comparisons" Huy Pham, Director of International Operations, American Refugee Committee "Lessons of Katrina: A Personal and Political Perspective" Professor August Nimtz, Department of Political Science, University of Minnesota 7pm on Thursday, October 13 120 Nolte Center for Continuing Education University of Minnesota, East Bank Campus 315 Pillsbury Drive SE, Minneapolis Light refreshments will be served. Donna Bauer is the current President of MNVOAD (Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster). Member of MNVOAD for 4 years and Secretary for one year, representative of Catholic Charities to MNVOAD. Employed at Catholic Charities in the Housing and Emergency Services Divisions, providing a multitude of services including: health and safety training and coordination of safety policies and programs. American Red Cross trainer and authorized provider. CERT member with the City of Minneapolis and City of New Brighton. Ms. Bauer will discuss various areas of MNVOAD organization operations: Camp Ripley, Twin Cities, Southern Deployments and Long Term Recovery. She will consider how state and federal responses might have differed from the past and implications for government/voluntary agency response in the future. August Nimtz, Jr., is Professor of Political Science at the University of Minnesota. His research Interests include African politics, urban politics, social movements, political development and Marxism. His Publications include Marx and Engels - Their Contribution to the Democratic Breakthrough, Islam and Politics in East Africa, and essays on Marxism, and the politics of socialist transformation in the Caribbean and South Africa. Professor Nimtz' remarks will discuss why, while Katrina was a natural phenomenon, the disaster that unfolded in its aftermath is a social phenonemon that was not inevitable but a reflection of the political/economic arrangements of a society. He will draw comparisons with the Cuban record in dealing with hurricanes. Huy Pham is the Director of International Operations at American Refugee Committee. Pham, who has worked on public health and social development issues since 1986, also served as the Africa regional manager for ARC programs in Liberia, Guinea, Rwanda, Sierra Leone and South Sudan. Pham was the director of the Children's Rights Program at Minnesota Advocates for Human Rights, co-edited the report, Global Child Survival: A Human Rights Priority (MAHR, 1998), and worked in Viet Nam with The Save the Children Fund/UK as a technical consultant for the Fund's HIV/AIDS Management and Prevention Programme. --------10 of 18-------- From: The Walker Art Center <mailing.list [at] walkerart.org> Subject: Super vision/theatre 10.13 8pm The world premiere of SUPER VISION, the multi-media collaboration between Obie Award-winning The Builders Association and digital design studio dbox October 13-15 8pm, October 16 7pm William and Nadine McGuire Theater Opening night is half-price for members! Thursday $25 ($13 Walker members); Friday-Sunday $25 ($20 Walker members) "The Builders Association is itself an innovator in multimedia theatre, using video, animation, sampled sounds and god-knows-what sorts of computerized gizmos to produce gorgeous illusions." -The Village Voice The Obie Award-winning performance company The Builders Association (Alladeen) and digital design studio dbox reveal a society in which "dataveillance" goes beyond anything Orwell ever imagined. Dive into this fresh, funny, and often disturbing combination of cutting-edge computer-generated animation, new video techniques, electronic music, and live performance. SUPER VISION probes three absorbing, intertwining, and all too-close-to-home stories drawn from the datasphere that explore the dangerous minefield of lives reduced to data. Due to increased activity in our neighborhood in September and October, we encourage you to use the City of Minneapolis parking garage at the Walker, accessible from Vineland Place and Bryant Avenue. Metro Transit bus lines 4, 6, 12, and 25 stop at the Walker, and bike racks are located at both entrances. --------11 of 18-------- From: Joan Malerich <justnad [at] comcast.net> Subject: Cuban five/CTV 10.13 8:30pm Cuban Five and Posada Cases on Cable TV, AlteraVista Thursday, October 13 on SPNN (St. Paul) Channel 15, 8:30 PM Prof. Peter Erlinder wrote a Brief Amicus Curiae of the National Lawyers Guild. Though many briefs were submitted, Dr. Erlinder's brief was most directly related to the venue decision of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals that reversed the trial decision against the Cuban Five. During their trial, the Cuban Five asked many times for a change of venue (location) from Miami, home of the Cuban-American Exile terrorists. Thought it was obvious Miami was the one place that the chance for a fair trial was zero, they were not granted the change of venue. The Appellate Court determined the Five should have a new trial in a different venue. This is the first time in US legal history that a Federal Appellate Court has reversed a trial court on the issue of venue. The Cuban Five are Cuban heroes who are political prisoners in the U.S. Their crime was trying nonviolently to stop terrorism against the Cuban people. They are NOT "spies," as they did not seek or get any information affecting the national security of the U.S. nor of the U.S. military. They were arrested September of 1998, held for 33 months without bail and held in isolation for 17 months. Three (Gerardo, Ramon, Antonio) were given life sentences, the other two (Rene and Fernando) 15 and 19 years. Two have not been allowed to see their wives for over five years, due to the US refusing them visas. Rene's seven year-old daughter has not seen her father for five years. Prof. Gary Prevost has taught Latin American studies for 30 years and is an expert on Cuban history and Cuban-United States political relations. Prevost explains the case of Cuba exile terrorist Luis Posada Carriles, who, among other terrorist acts, conspired in the planting of a bomb on a Cuban Airliner in 1976 that killed 73 innocent people. After escaping from a Venezuelan prison, Posada worked with Ollie North in the Iran-Contra Affair, planned the 1997 bombings of tourist sites in Havana, attempted to assassinate Fidel Castro in 2000. His life is one of terrorism. Last spring, Posada slipped into the US and asked for asylum. Venezuela legally requested extradition of Posada. Last week, the El Paso judge ruled against the extradition to Venezuela. This is just one more Cuban exile terrorist that the U.S. is harboring. --------12 of 18-------- Down the Rabbit Hole of Supply Side Economics: The Death of the Virtual Economy and the Middle Class by John M. Kelley www.dissidentvoice.org October 11, 2005 While politicians on both sides of the aisle refuse to talk about the war on the working class by the Bush administration, the increasing cliff edge disparity of wealth distribution in America is creeping precariously closer for the middle class. The grinding suffocation of poverty, always clear to the people on the bottom of our economy, is coming into view for a lot of folks who never suspected it would happen to them. Long sold a bill of goods that the poor were victims of their own bad judgment, middle class whites displaced by economic policies will soon be acutely aware of the personal impact of economic policy. Changes in several measurements reveal what many poor people have known for a long time: that there are severe class divides with high fences in between. Rapper Kanye West was wrong when he said this President doesn't care about black people. Bush doesn't care about the poor or middle class of any color. This is not a matter of being overlooked; it is a purposeful policy. The administration's policy in dealing with Hurricane Katrina is a perfect example. First Bush puts incompetent contributor cronies in charge of a vital government agency, robs its budget to expand its police state controls and then fails miserably at execution of its mission. After the disaster, he blames others, exploits the tragedy by giving no-bid, high profit handouts to campaign contributors, erasing regulations, cutting requirements to pay the prevailing wage and allowing contractors a free hand to hire illegal aliens. To pay for what has become the Katrina Campaign Payback Machine, he sends the bill to poor people by proposing cutting food stamps, Medicaid, Medicare, higher education and teacher preparation. But one thing the President does like is welfare. The oil companies, awash in profits, just received $14 billion in new tax breaks and he has just promised more along with loosened regulations to build more refineries. But that is just the beginning. There is the $125 billion that is being given in corporate tax abatements, price supports, tax shelters and subsidies, $44 billion to the space industry for a repeat trip to the moon, $8 billion for the unnecessary and unworkable Star Wars program. Bush's sympathy is virtually boundless for the military industrial complex and he threatens to veto the imperial war budget of $480 billion dollars (more then the next 38 countries combined) because he says it isn't enough. Killing people is a much higher priority than saving them. Even more unbelievable, he still wants to move ahead with more tax cuts for the rich who are hardly carrying a crushing tax burden. Tax revenue from corporations fell 16% between 1995-2003 to only 7.4% of the total federal income. While corporate tax rates are theoretically 35%, the General Accounting Office reports that 45% of corporations worth more then $250 million paid no taxes from 1995-2003. The ten companies with the highest profits paid an average rate of 8.9%. Not satisfied with this, the Bush administration has proposed that $350 billion of profits hidden offshore be allowed back into the country at a special tax rate of 5.25%. Wealthy individuals are also doing well under the Bush tax cut scheme. While the bottom 20% of taxpayers (under $13,478/year) will save an annual average of $23 and the median taxpayer saves about $800 dollars a year, those with an annual income of $1 million save $32,000; the top .1 of one percent $195,762; and the top 400 taxpayers $8.3 million dollars every year. After they accumulate that money, Bush wants to make sure they keep it for generations by getting rid of the estate tax. That creates financial dynasties, so people like him will never have to compete with working people to retain their position in life. If that wasn't bad enough federal funds to state and local government that help community infrastructure have been cut causing an increased burden in fees, property, sales and other taxes that fall disproportionately on the middle class and poor, usually more then wiping out any income tax reduction. The chasm between rich and poor is widening by the day. Real income for working families declined 4.8% ($2576) while it increased 1.7% (that's of a much bigger income) for the wealthy since 2000. Asset ownership is very revealing, with the top 5% owning 60% of all assets in the country while the bottom 40% shares 1%. The ratio of CEO to worker pay has increased from 301-1 to 431-1 since 1990. While 77% of the poorest performing wealthy kids go to college, only 78% of the highest performing poor kids go. Drowning in debt, 5.4 million working class families fell below the poverty level of $19,000 for a family of four in the last four years. That standard hasn't been adjusted in so long that it is estimated to be only half of what is needed to meet basic needs. That would mean that one-third of the children in the country are being raised in homes where their parents can't provide adequate tools to succeed in life. One good indicator of the truth of this argument is that 45.8 million people don't have insurance in addition to the 13.3 million children and elderly that is covered by Medicaid and Medicare. When it comes to tax policy for the poor, it's a different story. The much heralded child tax credit is only collected by a quarter of the poor; the other three-quarters don't make enough to even get that. Then there are those living off the gravy train of welfare, which averages $193 dollars per family per month in Texas, Bush's role model for the country. The number of poor has been growing every year since Bush took office. We now have almost twice as many people living below the poverty line then the total population of Australia. There are tax subsidies for the middle class but they too benefit corporations as much as taxpayers. The $140 billion in healthcare tax subsidies give a tax write off to employers; $70-80 billion in pension plan tax subsidies boost financial institution revenues; $61 in mortgage interest deductions support banks and mortgage houses. As the current recession deepens and more people fall from the middle class, they will lose the ability to pay to take advantage of these tax breaks. In the past, bankruptcy (mostly attributable to loss of spouse, job or serious health problem) has been able to save middle class economic casualties from permanent banishment. Not any more. In addition to higher filing costs, there will be higher attorneys fees, "education" fees and stiffer documentation requirements. Many won't even have the money to file, and many of those who do will find themselves bound in a state of perpetual bondage for many years. Small businesses are specifically bound by these rules as well, while large corporations will operate pretty much as in the past. After middle class citizens fall from grace they will discover the feeling a lot of poor people already have: the boot on the neck that keeps you down. It costs a lot of money to be poor. Paying to get your check cashed or your bills paid, buying in small quantities at higher prices, living in drafty houses, having a beater car if you have one at all, getting stopped and fined by the cops more often, having to rent to own at 450% interest, being forced to take out a payday loan at 750% interest, not being able to afford a dentist or doctor and missing more work, if you can find a job, because of it. The poor pay more for just about everything. Once down most people stay there. The American myth of lifting one's own bootstraps is a lie. The poor are disproportionately being killed in our war of global adventurism. Here at home poor people go to jail more often, suffer more health problems and die sooner. Class mobility is another myth. During the go-go years of 1988-98, when poverty decreased every year, only 2.5% from the bottom fifth made it to the middle fifth of the income range. Now that is getting worse every year. The promise of Jude Wanniski's supply side economics is producing the destruction of the middle class and the grinding down of the poor in America. The theory is that if you cut taxes and give more money to the rich they will invest it creating more jobs. The problem is that is exactly what they are doing, but the jobs are in Honduras, Bangladesh, China and India where that capital will produce a bigger profit margin by exploiting even poorer people. The extraction of capital from the country by the Bush administration on behalf of their corporate contributors reveals the chop shop mentality of a hostile takeover. George Bush, Dick Cheney and Alan Greenspan have stolen the car (remember the election), disassembled it and are selling off the parts. Since 9/11 the only thing that has kept the virtual economy of America alive is massive tax cuts, robbery of the public treasury surpluses and leaving IOUs, low interest rates enticing the middle class to mortgage their assets to maintain their lifestyle, and a trade deficit that French author Emmanuel Todd calls a form of foreign tribute. Now with skyrocketing energy costs and a popping housing bubble, an economic plunge and massive class displacement is about to occur. Poor people have known for a long time what Supply Side Economics means. Now a whole lot of middle-class people are about to find out as well. When they do they might have some serious rethinking to do about class. Let the revolution begin. John M. Kelley is a teacher, philosopher, writer, artist, political activist, singer of ballads, rebellious Irishman and agent for change who worries daily about the world he is leaving for his grandchildren. His blog is at: www.mytown.ca/johnkelley. --------13 of 18-------- Industrialized Greed Produces Pandemics by Manuel Garca, Jr. www.dissidentvoice.org October 11, 2005 I have a sideline answering questions about radioactivity. Recently, a friend asked: does prolonged exposure to radioactive weapon residue (like depleted uranium dust) lead to outbreaks of mutated strains of viruses, such as Avian Flu? This leads to the further question of why pandemics, like the killer 1918 "Spanish Flu" - which originated in the United States - arise in the first place. Avian Flu occurs naturally as several families of viruses in birds, who often do not get sick but merely host the disease, like Typhoid Mary. It is noted that certain of the Avian Flu virus types are evolving - adapting - rapidly. One of these strains, H5N1, was able to make a jump to humans and overpower the human immune system. This was the outbreak of 1997. While the 1997 outbreak killed millions of birds and scores of people, this particular strain of the virus had not acquired the genes necessary to make it similar to the usual human flu viruses, and so it was not easily transmitted from person to person. If - or when - an Avian Flu viral strain does combine with a typical human flu virus, gaining the genes needed to make it easily infectious by breath: sneezes, coughs and exhalations, then we might see a pandemic. Since the Avian flu that has infected people since 1997 is quite lethal (up to 50% mortality) as compared to the mild forms of human flu we are accustomed to, an easily transmitted form could produce another great killing like that of 1918-1919. Such a bird-carried, human-infecting disease would have a vast incubator in the many industrial concentrations of domestic fowl maintained for human consumption. I've not seen any credible connection between radioactivity and Avian Flu. In these last few days it has been announced that researchers have been able to replicate the 1918 flu virus, H1N1. It is kept under tight security in government laboratories. The raw material for the replication was viral RNA extracted from lung tissue of 1918 flu victims; some of this from preserved specimens, and some from cadavers buried in Alaskan permafrost (and none too soon, as it's starting to melt up there). The 1918 influenza virus is one million times more virulent than the usual human flu viruses of today. Fortunately, people today will have some immunity to the H1N1 family of viruses (how much?). H1N1 is an Avian Flu, which appears to have made a direct jump from birds to humans in 1918 and then raced through humanity without first acquiring some genes from human flu viruses. This is a surprising short-cut. Usually, flu viruses which jump species then mutate slightly by acquiring some genes of viruses already in the new host so they can operate - reproduce and avoid the immune system - in their new organism. The 1918 pandemic seems to have started in Haskell County, Kansas in January 1918, becoming a serious Army manpower issue at Fort Riley, Kansas in March 1918, and spreading throughout Army camps in the U.S. during March and April, and along the routes of military transport within the U.S. and Europe; recall World War One was in its fourth year. In late August and early September it broke out in Boston, Brest (France) and Freetown (Sierra Leone). H1N1 killed up to one third of those stricken, October 1918 being the deadliest month of the worldwide outbreak and of US history, during which 195,000 Americans alone died of influenza. Wikipedia notes that, "Global mortality rate from the influenza was estimated at 2.5%.5% of the population, with some 20% of the world population suffering from the disease to some extent. The disease spread across the world killing twenty-five million in the course of six months; some estimates put the total of those killed worldwide at over twice that number, possibly as high as 100 million." The entire H1N1 outbreak was over within 18 months. What are the prospects for a similar outbreak today? Mike Davis has a recent book on today's Avian Flu, describing the potential for a pandemic. Though no life-scientist, I note and find it interesting that a number of fatal respiratory infection viral diseases are carried by wildlife that permeate the human environment, specifically birds, deer mice, pigeons and bats: Avian Flu (wild fowl and chicken coops), Hanta Virus (desiccated mice droppings, pulverized and airborne), Legionnaires' Disease, (pigeon droppings in ventilator ducts), SARS (horseshoe bats - a species native of Southeast Asia - as the initial carrier, then also civet cats who may prey on bats; the bats and civets finding their way into exotic cuisine, while bat droppings may be used as fertilizer and in medicinal or other concoctions). The Ebola Virus, again a family of a particular type, is suspected of jumping species from monkeys to humans in Africa. Transmission between humans is by contact (say with infected blood), and transmission by respiration is unknown with the possible exception of one case. Some suspect that humans were first infected by slaughtering and consuming "bushmeat." The same can be said for AIDS, probably of simian origin. All of these diseases and epidemics seem to spring from the friction of human poverty grinding into the natural world. An unsanitary push against Nature by crowded poverty in search of food causes disease to invade humanity. Can it be that overcrowding and poverty are much more potent as causes of disease than radioactivity or even chemical pollution? The need for food by the masses in Southeast Asia fuels the operation of crowded and dirty poultry operations. Having smelled some US fowl and poultry operations from the roadside, and been to small farms, I have trouble believing there are completely sanitary industrial concentrations of birds anywhere. Researchers often use chicken eggs to grow experimental cultures (and vaccines) in, so I suppose Nature can use the whole chicken coop world to grow viruses designed for wide transmission, as well. These diseases may be less those of "the poor and backward," because poverty and backwardness are ancient yet the diseases are new, and more accurately recognized as the diseases of those left behind by the acceleration of industrialized greed, which we chose to call "globalization" to spare the feelings of those who enjoy the benefits of the system they manage, which is "capitalism." The natural thrust of capitalism is to push into the natural world with haste, so as to win in the race to exploit; and the natural product of capitalism is a wealthy elite and a mass of poverty. Disease springs out of the struggles of poverty. The profit motive obstructs any downward transfer of wealth in the form of subsidies for better living conditions and for the free worldwide use of medical and pharmaceutical advances. Expending the elite's wealth to subsidize disease prevention and treatment generally is anti-capitalism, by ideological definition it is communism. Under capitalism the existence of disease is perfectly acceptable if it is a source of profit for some, as only winners matter. The existence of these new diseases is a reverberation from the natural world of the human obsession with capitalism; a sickness of the individual and collective mind is reflected by Nature as disease, a consequence of our actions in conducting human affairs on this planet. Global Warming is another such reverberation. The kernel of disease is the idea that our greed and our bigotry can be practiced in isolation, and that this justification sanctifies the practice. Behold the genius of the marketplace. Manuel Garca, Jr. can be reached at mango [at] idiom.com. --------14 of 18-------- Breaking the Bank: The Rightwing Road to America's Privatized Future by Bill Willers Published on Tuesday, October 11, 2005 by CommonDreams.org In September, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, in a comment perhaps not intended for publication, told Thierry Breton, French Finance Minister, that the US budget is out of control with the country being plunged ever more deeply into debt. The Economist reported Breton's disappointment "... that the management of debt is not a political priority today." Breton was wrong. Accumulation of massive debt is the number one priority of the Bush Administration - a deliberate, managed move toward its goal of an "ownership society" in which all aspects are privatized. Since the introduction of the massive Republican tax cuts, many observers understood immediately that they were to plunge government into debt, thereby undercutting its ability to fund social programs such as Medicare and Social Security, and to administer public domain that has long belonged to all citizens in common. In May of 2003, Princeton economist Paul Krugman wrote that "gimmicks used to make an $800-billion-plus tax cut carry a price tag of only $320 billion are a joke ... The people now running America aren't conservatives: they're radicals who want to do away with the social and economic system we have, and the fiscal crisis they are concocting may give them the excuse they need." Krugman had plenty of company. Peronet Dispeignes reported in the Financial Times of London that the Bush Administration had shelved a report commissioned by the Treasury that showed the US facing a future of chronic federal budget deficits totaling at least $44.2 trillion in current US dollars, and that closing the gap would require the equivalent of an immediate and permanent 66% across-the-board tax increase. Bill Moyers, on his PBS show NOW, said "We are watching the country's future slip deeper and deeper into a black hole of red ink." The corporate sphere has spent countless millions lobbying for deregulation of its activities, for maintaining specific legislators in office, and for the privatization of everything from health care to education to Social Security to federal lands, including national parks. The goal is ownership and control of every corner of society by a "private sector" primarily in the form of corporations. Over more than a century of legal maneuvering, corporations have been able to create for themselves the status of "persons" in US law, so that the fortunes they lavish have, absurdly, become "free speech". They have also acquired ownership of mainstream media and so have been able to obscure the significance and gravity of the situation while simultaneously perpetuating another widely believed absurdity, that of "the liberal media". A key mechanism for privatization is "outsourcing" to the private sector jobs that have historically been governmental. National parks, it seems, have been a trial area for this. Plans for the privatization of parks have lain obscurely on the rightwing to-do list for more than 20 years, and now the Bush Administration is allowing them to move ahead quickly. Terry Anderson, lead architect of a strategy to transfer America's public lands into private ownership over a forty-year span, advises President Bush on public lands matters. Early in 2003, Interior Secretary Gale Norton announced her intention to outsource as many as 11,000 (72%) positions in the US Park Service. Shortly thereafter, President Bush declared that as many as 850,000 federal positions could become privatized. This is an attack on public ownership and of federal programs supportive of the poorer and middle classes that together constitute the bulk of society. While framed as an argument for fiscal efficiency, it is a recipe for a two-tiered society of a super rich minority atop a vast underclass of workers. The Bush Administration's assault on government, under the banner of "cutting federal spending", is the cause of a FEMA underfunded into relative impotence and for inadequate levees in New Orleans. But even as we are learning that the cost of reconstructing the Gulf Coast will be (yet another) $200 billion, and that no-bid contracts (yet again) are being handed to Halliburton, news comes that to pay for it all will require "further cuts in federal spending". And things just don't add up. Well, perhaps they do. Maybe they make even more obvious the Republican game plan to plunge government so deeply into debt that it can no longer offer support to the larger citizenry, and that this can only result in the corporate sector winning by default and becoming, in principle, like so many mediaeval landowners. Looking ahead, one sees the main controlling element of society not a government of, by and for the people but a corporate sector that controls life's essentials and charges as much as the market will bear. "Nothing personal; just business". Rightwing strategist Grover Norquist's stated goal of shrinking government so that it can be, as he put it, "drowned in a bathtub", is now being fast-tracking at a rate that must surprise even him. Bill Willers is an Emeritus Professor of Biology, University of Wisconsin at Oshkosh. --------15 of 18-------- Bunker Days with Reichsfuhrer George by Mike Whitney www.dissidentvoice.org October 10, 2005 Bush's speech to the National Endowment for Democracy was a long and tedious journey through the shadowy world of terrorism. It was loaded with the same wearisome phantoms and dreary evildoers that have appeared in every Bush speech since September 2001. Bush is beginning to sound like the three-wheeled ox-cart trundling down the road emitting the same shrill screech with every rotation. The man needs some new material. His dismal performance last Thursday further demonstrated his inability to grasp reality or to deal with the mess he's created. He dredged up the lackluster imagery of 9-11 to cobble together a 40-minute monologue that excluded every topic of national interest except terrorism. Even his audience, which was chock full of flag-waving jingoes and "democracy-spreading" zealots, appeared dumbstruck. "Recently our country observed the fourth anniversary of a great evil, and looked back on a great turning point in our history," Bush said. "We will confront this mortal danger to all humanity. We will not tire, or rest, until the war on terror is won." 9-11, 9-11, 9-11, ad infinitum. Bush's penchant for repetition would leave Joseph Goebbels wincing. It's simply impossible to reiterate the same mantra for four years without producing a jaw-dropping silence among one's audience. That's especially true given the latest polls that show that only 7% of Americans think that terrorism is the most important topic on the national docket. For Bush, however, terrorism is the last flimsy bit of straw that holds his presidency together. "Our nation stood guard on tense borders; we spoke for the rights of dissidents and the hopes of exile; we aided the rise of new democracies on the ruins of tyranny," Bush boomed. "In this new century, freedom is once again assaulted by enemies determined to roll back generations of democratic progress." Bush's delusional ravings are increasingly reminiscent of his German forebears in the waning "bunker days" of the Reich. Is there someone in the crowd who hasn't heard of Bush's threat to veto a Defense Dept spending bill to preserve his inalienable right to torture prisoners? And yet, even while the bombs are falling on far off Tal Afar, or thousands of America's poor and huddled masses have been shunted off to relocation centers, or hundreds of skeletal prisoners in Guantanamo waste away under Bush's approving glare, the imposter-in-chief still rattles on about "freedom and democracy." It's extraordinary. Bush's soliloquy contained all the shrill invective and empty-headed rhetoric we've heard a thousand times before; the same bedraggled metaphors the same fusty platitudes, the same scripted delivery. "While the killers choose their victims indiscriminately, their attacks serve a clear and focused ideology, a set of beliefs and goals that are evil, but not insane. Some call this evil Islamic radicalism; others, militant Jihadism; still others, Islamo-fascism.... This form of radicalism exploits Islam to serve a violent, political vision: the establishment, by terrorism and subversion and insurgency, of a totalitarian empire that denies all political and religious freedom." Bush has joined fellow travelers Hitchens, Friedman, and Blair in pushing the errant theory that terrorism arises from an "evil ideology." The assumption has been discredited by experts like Robert Pape, who have proved beyond a doubt that more than 90% of all terrorist attacks are a response to occupation not ideology. They hate our soldiers garrisoned in their countries not "our freedoms". "Figures show that Al Qaida today is less a product of Islamic fundamentalism than of a simple strategic goal: to compel the US and Western allies to withdraw combat forces from the Arabian Peninsula and other Muslim counties." (Robert Pape, NY Times, July 9, 2005) Still, we can't expect Bush or his dissembling cadres to abandon their last frail shred of legitimacy. No way. If Bush was serious about "evil ideologies" he'd direct his attention to the neocon dogma that has already killed and maimed hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians, with millions more entering the imperial crosshairs every day. Who are the real terrorists? "We know the vision of the radicals because they've openly stated it," Bush averred. "The militant network wants to use the vacuum created by an American retreat to gain control of a country.... The terrorists regard Iraq as the central front in their war against humanity. And we must recognize Iraq as the central front in our war on terror." Blah, blah, blah. There's nothing here but pure, unalloyed fear mongering; five years of blather neatly wrapped in one fatuous paragraph. What a pathetic creature Bush is; a tattered coat-on-a-stick waving his finger in the air in false bravado with head bobbing like it's on a spring. What a poseur, a flimsy, cardboard cut out of a man, slapped on a TV screen in a blue suit, or with sleeves rolled up for a Crawford photo-op. If you could get close enough you could pass your hand through this pasty-gray hologram; this vacuous political light show that appears like an apparition and then vanishes into thin air; its 100% fakery from stem to stern. How apropos that Bush would proffer his terror fantasies to the NED, that amalgam of global warriors who are under contract to spread the neoliberal message to the four corners of the earth; the modern-day Trostkyites who siphon money from the public till to topple regimes and bring in the corporate parasites from Halliburton, Bechtel and Blackwater. How convenient to have the forces of empire assembled under one bloodstained banner to reaffirm their lifelong commitment to pilfering the world's oil and grinding the great mass of humanity into endless, crushing poverty. Bush's terror-speech will do nothing to boost his popularity. The latest polls all show Bush and Co headed for the bottom of the political fish tank. Don't expect a change in tactics though, Bush will ride bin Laden's coattails to the bitter end. Terrorism is the grand deception; the "Big Lie" that animates the war machine and breathes life into the crusade of wanton destruction. "The murderous ideology of the Islamic radicals is the great challenge of our new century." It's like the ideology of communism - and explains their cold-blooded contempt for human life. "Like the ideology of communism, our new enemy is dismissive of free peoples, claiming that men and women who live in liberty are weak and decadent.... Those who despise freedom and progress have condemned themselves to isolation, decline, and collapse. Because free peoples believe in the future, free peoples will own the future.". Yup. Four years later and they still "hate our freedoms". They're not seeking relief from the American soldier who has a boot on their neck, or who shoots them at check-points, or who humiliates them in their own home in front of their children, or who tortures them in Saddam's prisons, or who bombs their wedding parties, or who poisons their land, or who steals their resources, or who savagely kills over 100,000 of their brothers and sisters. Nope, it's "our freedoms" they hate. The people who tuned in to Bush"s speech thinking they'd hear something different, some willingness to change direction and put the ship of state aright, must have been sorely disappointed. The Bush loyalists are radicals to the core, unable to accept responsibility for their actions and incapable of reason. The speech was the culmination of five years of unrelenting deception and demagoguery. Nothing has changed. It's futile to hope that fanaticism can be tempered or mitigated. It's either rooted out or it spreads. Mike Whitney lives in Washington state, and can be reached at: fergiewhitney [at] msn.com. --------16 of 18-------- Good News at Last! The IMF Has Lost Its Influence By MARK WEISBROT CounterPunch October 12, 2005 Sometimes historic changes take place quietly, while no one is looking. Great institutions lose power with a whimper rather than a bang. Such is the case of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which will hold its annual fall meetings with the World Bank next week in Washington D.C. Just a few years ago, the IMF was the most powerful financial institution in the world. When financial and economic crises swept across East Asia in 1997, it was the IMF that laid down the painful conditions that governments had to meet in order to access more than $120 billion in foreign funds. When the financial contagion spread to Russia and Brazil, the IMF followed, brokering the multi-billion dollar loans that - however unsuccessfully - were intended to prop up overvalued currencies on the brink of collapse. Those days are over. The Asian countries began, after their nightmarish experience with the Fund in 1997-1998, to pile up huge international foreign exchange reserves - partly so they would never have to go begging to the IMF again. But the final blow to the Fund came from the country that IMF First Deputy Managing Director Anne Krueger reportedly calls "the A-word": Argentina. Argentina suffered through a terrible four-year depression, beginning in 1998. A country that had recently ranked among the highest for living standards in Latin America soon had the majority of the country falling below the poverty line. Many Argentines blamed the IMF, which had played a major role in designing the policies that led to the collapse, and seemed to prescribe just the wrong medicine during the crisis: high interest rates, budget tightening, and maintaining the Argentine peso's unsustainable link to the U.S. dollar. In December of 2001 the government defaulted on $100 billion of debt, the largest sovereign debt default in history. The currency and the banking system collapsed, and the country sank further into depression. But only for about three more months. Then, to most people's surprise, the economy began to recover. The recovery began and continued without any help from the IMF. On the contrary: in 2002, the Fund and other official creditors (including the World Bank), actually took a net $4.1 billion - more than 4 percent of GDP - out of Argentina. But the government was able to chart more of its own economic course, rejecting IMF demands for higher interest rates, increased budget austerity, and utility price increases. Argentina also took a hard line with foreign creditors holding defaulted debt, despite repeated threats from the Fund. When push came to shove in September 2003, Argentina did the unthinkable: a temporary default to the IMF itself, until the Fund backed down. The result: a rapid and robust economic recovery, with a remarkable 8.8 percent growth in GDP for 2003 and 9 percent for 2004. With a projected 7.3 percent GDP gain for 2005, Argentina is still the fastest growing economy in Latin America. Prior to Argentina's 2003 showdown with the Fund, only failed or "pariah" states with nothing left to lose - e.g. Congo, Iraq - had defaulted to the IMF. That's because of the IMF's power to cut off not only its own credit but also most loans from the larger World Bank, other multilateral lenders, the rich country governments, and even much of the private sector. This has been the source of the IMF's enormous influence over economic policy in developing countries: in effect, a creditors' cartel led by the Fund, which is answerable primarily to the U.S. Treasury Department. But Argentina showed that a country that was flat on its back could stand up to the IMF, and not only live to tell about it, but even launch a solid economic recovery. This changed the world. Although the IMF still carries a lot of weight in poorer countries (for example, in Sub-Saharan Africa), its influence in the middle-income countries has plummeted. The Fund is now a shadow of its former self. Reformers over the last 15 years debated whether change would come about through the IMF altering its policies, or through the Fund losing influence. That debate has now been settled by history. The IMF has not been reformed, but its power to shape economic policy in developing countries has been enormously reduced. Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, in Washington, D.C. He is the author, with Dean Baker, of Social Security: the Phony Crisis. He can be reached at: weisbrot [at] cepr.net [Way to go, Argentina! Since we in America are unable to get the national government or the national parties to defend us, and since we watch in well-trained helplessness, we have to depend entirely on foreign countries able to wiggle out from under the American thumb. Argentina is one. Iraqi resistence is another. Years ago, Vietnam resistence was another. Far better that we defend ourselves, but we seem to be too glazed over in the eyes to force change. Just when we might get up and do something, we take a Hillary pill.2008, and go back to sleep. -ed] --------17 of 18-------- George Bush and the Four Horsemen by Mike Whitney www.dissidentvoice.org October 11, 2005 It's becoming apparent to even the most avid Bush loyalist that the current charlatan-in-chief has been the greatest catastrophe in the nation's 200-year history. Regrettably, there are strong indications that the Crawford albatross is planning to pull us further downward towards the ocean floor. At present, the republic is buckling beneath the weight of deception, violence and incompetence. In Iraq, the plan to chop up the country into three smaller parts is moving ahead despite the intensity of the resistance or the objections of the Sunni minority. Bush has assumed the mantle of an Iraqi Jefferson Davis championing the merits of reformation and regional autonomy. The new constitution provides only the thinnest cover for a neocon master plan that destroys what little is left of Iraqi society while legitimizing a permanent American occupation. Al Jaafari, Talibani, Chalabi and the long list of rogues and collaborators have made their Faustian bargain with their US overlords and put their country on a course that will result in decades of hardship and slaughter. All for what? A mottled earthen hut in the world's most perilous gated community - the green zone? At home the effects of Bush's rule have been equally harsh. The anarchic Bush has rummaged through the Bill of Rights like a draught horse in a steeple case. No statute, law or amendment has escaped his withering attention. One by one, he's savaged the constitutional protections that once shielded the citizen from the long arm of the state. He's cut through 800 years of English and American jurisprudence like the Grim Reaper on saint's day, leaving nothing behind but the gulags that house his victims. In the next six months the country will face its greatest challenge since the Civil War. The confluence of potential threats is unprecedented. Experts are predicting that oil supplies will not meet demand in the first quarter of 2006. This is bound to cause skyrocketing prices, long lines at gas stations, a downward trend in the economy, and a declining dollar. The American economic landscape, already full of potholes, is heading for an even bumpier road ahead. The soaring deficits, the jobless recovery, the humongous housing bubble, and a personal savings rate lower than any time since the Great Depression, all foreshadow an end to the giddy Clinton-era prosperity. Meanwhile, the Bush troupe is on a spending bacchanal that's put the country on the fast track to ruin. Bush is like the girl who couldn't say no, shoveling out the bucket loads of cash to every mega-corporation that lines up at the White House lawn with a begging bowl in hand. A quick review of Iraq (where the $18 billion in reconstruction money vanished into the flannel pockets of Bush constituents) or New Orleans (the next destination for the ravenous corporate parasites) shows that the well-oiled system of cronyism is in full meltdown mode. There's simply not enough payola to fill the coffers of every crook in the Bush phone directory. The market is getting increasingly anxious with the drunken spending frenzy and needs only the slightest shove to put it into a nosedive. As Allan Greenspan admitted, the spending is "out of control," and yet the stealing continues unabated. No Fed chieftain or money managing magician is strong enough to rescue the drowning economy from its doldrums. The rock hard foundation of fiscal solvency has been utterly abandoned. America's energy future is looking even more tenuous than the economy. Oil supplies are stretched to the limit and available resources are reaching the point of diminishing returns. The double whammy of Katrina and Rita has put the entire Gulf region on life-support making our dependence on foreign oil greater than ever. It's no wonder the Bush administration chose Iraq as the second domino in its global crusade. The oil business is built on projections and we can be reasonably certain that they saw that the wiggle room was disappearing from the market. The collection of corporate kingpins in the administration is not persuaded by sentimentality; they don't trudge off to war for freedom or democracy, but cold, hard cash. The chance to control the last of the world's oil proved irresistibly seductive, especially since it was the only way to perpetuate the caste system that has dominated the planet since the eighteenth century. It's impossible to imagine that Bush or his fellows would abdicate what they believe is their birthright: the continuation of elite white male rule into perpetuity. But now, of course, they've hit a glitch. Iraq has changed from cakewalk to quagmire in a matter of months and the entire project is going sideways. The combination of poor planning, insufficient numbers of troops and the most inept civilian leadership in Pentagon history has torpedoed the Bush strategy to extend the realm and secure vital oil supplies. In other words, we're up the creek. Bad luck follows Bush like a shadow. Another three years and the frogs and locusts will be collecting at the borders ready to pick the last flaccid strands of flesh off the American dream. Even barring another onslaught of biblical type hurricanes, the steady militarization, the flat-lining economy, and the bird flu will certainly finish us off. The first major wrinkles in the oil supply are expected sometime in January. We can assume the credit weary, overextended American public will be gasping for air shortly thereafter. It was a great run while it lasted. We reached Olympus long enough to unfurl the banner before tumbling back down to terra firma. What more can we expect? Maybe we should just quietly take our seats on the USS Hindenburg and let our madcap captain point us towards the blackest thundercloud on the horizon. We're doomed anyway. Mike Whitney lives in Washington state, and can be reached at: fergiewhitney [at] msn.com. --------18 of 18-------- Whose Freedom Do We Mean? by Gary Steven Corseri www.dissidentvoice.org October 11, 2005 Whose Freedom Do We Mean? "One man's freedom to swing his arms ends where another man's nose begins." Unless, of course, the alleged proboscis is sniffing where it don't belong - in our business - which is sacrosanct. Such sniffing would be wrong! I need not remind you, jury members, you serve by the sufferance of the State. We have delegated certain powers; we expect you to accommodate. Those freedoms defined by our Constitution Come not within your purview. Just watch the judge and you'll catch on - What's fitting in this venue. When you pledge allegiance to our flag, when you swear upon the Bible, you let us know you like our show. Don't make us sue for libel! You're free, of course, to forswear your oath, to renege, renounce, appeal. (If the FBI gives you the eye, you get one free call from jail.) Freedom is a slippery slope, watered with patriots' blood. In their name, we strive to keep it pure, and nip dissent in the bud. Inquire not too deeply. (Politics is a maze.) Hold hard to right, make the good fight. A good soldier obeys. Capitalism built this country; Its truth we'll never lose. You're free, of course, to disagree. We're free to kill you when we choose. Gary Steven Corseri's dramas have been published, and broadcast over PBS-Atlanta; his prose and poems have appeared at DissidentVoice, The New York Times, CounterPunch, CommonDreams, Village Voice, Redbook, etc. He has published two novels, two poetry collections, taught in universities and prisons, and edited the Manifestations anthology. He can be contacted at corseri [at] verizon.net. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - David Shove shove001 [at] tc.umn.edu rhymes with clove Progressive Calendar over 2225 subscribers as of 12.19.02 please send all messages in plain text no attachments
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.