Progressive Calendar 01.20.09 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: David Shove (shove001![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:18:57 -0800 (PST) |
P R O G R E S S I V E C A L E N D A R 01.20.09 1. Overcoming Zionism 1.20 5pm 2. RNC court watch 1.20 6pm 3. Salon 1.20 6:30pm 4. NW Neighbors CC 1.20 7pm 5. Billboards yuk 1.21 12noon 6. Citizen video 1.21 12noon 7. Econmelt 1.21 6pm 8. RNC 8 fundraiser 1.21 7pm 9. Tommy Stevenson - "This Land Is Your Land" like Woody wrote it 10. Michael Parenti - Capitalism's self-inflicted apocalypse 11. Kevin Gray - S Africa to Israel: time for a new divestment campaign --------1 of 11------- From: Eric Angell <eric-angell [at] riseup.net> Subject: Overcoming Zionism 1.20 5pm Sure-footed St. Paul Neighborhood Network (SPNN) viewers: "Our World In Depth" cablecasts on SPNN Channel 15 on Tuesdays at 5pm, midnight and Wednesday mornings at 10am, after DemocracyNow! All households with basic cable may watch. Tues, 1/20, 5pm & midnight and Wed, 1/21, 10am Overcoming Zionism with Joel Kovel A secular Jew (and eco-socialist), Joel Kovel is a great American thinker and author of many books. Once a practicing psychiatrist and psychoanalyst, Kovel is now a Professor of Social Studies at Bard College in NY. Kovel's 2007 book, "Overcoming Zionism", was briefly banned due to its critique of Israel. In late 2008 Joel Kovel visited the Twin Cities and spoke about "Overcoming Zionism" and the struggle to get these ideas out to the U.S. public. Includes Q and A. --------2 of 11-------- From: Do'ii <syncopatingrhythmsabyss [at] gmail.com> Subject: RNC court watch 1.20 6pm RNC Court Watchers are in need of participants to help with organizing court information, documentation and etc. RNC Court Watchers Meetings are every Tuesday, 6 P.M. at Caffeto's. Below is announcement for our meetings. Preemptive raids, over 800 people arrested, police brutality on the streets and torture in Ramsey County Jail. Police have indiscriminately used rubber bullets, concussion grenades, tasers and chemical irritants to disperse crowds and incapacitate peaceful, nonviolent protesters. The RNC-8 and others are facing felonies and years in jail. We must fight this intimidation, harassment and abuse! Join the RNC Court Solidarity Meeting this coming Tuesday at Caffetto's to find out how you can make a difference in the lives of many innocent people. Caffetto's Coffeehouse and Gallery (612)872-0911 708 W 22nd Street, Minneapolis, MN 55405 Every Tuesday @ 6:00 P.M to 7:00 P.M participate and help organize RNC court solidarity. For more information, please contact: rnccourtwatch [at] gmail.com THE PEOPLE UNITED WILL NEVER BE DEFEATED! --------3 of 11-------- From: patty <pattypax [at] earthlink.net> Subject: Salon 1.20 6:30pm To celebrate the Inauguration of President Obama, Tuesday, Jan 20, we will have a night to let him know what we want him to do as our President. I will have postcards, but if you have any cards you want to get rid of, we can use them, too. Pax Salons ( http://justcomm.org/pax-salon ) are held (unless otherwise noted in advance): Tuesdays, 6:30 to 8:30 pm. Mad Hatter's Tea House, 943 W 7th, St Paul, MN Salons are free but donations encouraged for program and treats. Call 651-227-3228 or 651-227-2511 for information. --------4 of 11-------- From: Allan Hancock <alforgreens [at] gmail.com> Subject: NW Neighbors CC 1.20 7pm Now that the legislative session has begun it is time to weigh in as citizens to see that our elected representatives at the state and local level hear our voices. As a previous candidate for the state legislature I would like to continue the dialog with friends and neighbors. Please join other neighbors at the Brookdale library, 6125 Shingle Creek Pk on Tuesday, January 20 at 7PM.in meeting room I. This meeting will be a non-partisan town hall forum. Following our discussions an agenda for future meetings will be set and anyone interested can join me at the Capitol in January to lobby for some of your concerns. Refreshments will be served. Any questions or need a ride please contact: Allan Hancock, Community Organizer (763)-561-9758 or email: hancock46B [at] gmail.com -------5 of 11-------- From: Gerry Mischke <mail [at] geraldmischke.com> Subject: Billboards yuk 1.21 12noon Please Come To A Very Special Event - All Are Welcome! Saint Paul Billboards Brown Bag Lunch Slideshow & Discussion Wednesday, January 21, 2009 at Noon in Room 40 of City Hall (Lower Level of Court House) There will be an open discussion and brown bag lunch for anyone concerned with Saint Paul's environment, quality of life and scenic beauty. The highlight of this brown bag lunch will be the "world premiere" of a video slideshow, produced by Scenic Saint Paul volunteers, showing every billboard in Saint Paul - all 561 of them - ward by ward. We invite people on all sides of this issue, including district councils, community business associations, city staff, elected officials, chambers of commerce, and the billboard industry, to engage in a meaningful discussion about the future of outdoor advertising in Saint Paul. Whether you appreciate billboards or not, it is our goal to share information regarding the impact that city and state legislation has had on this issue in Saint Paul. Wednesday, January 21, 2009, from Noon to 1pm Room 40 in the lower level of the City Hall/Court House Cookies and beverages will be provided. Please bring your own lunch. co-hosts for this event include: The CapitolRiver Council Dayton's Bluff District 4 Community Council Friends of the Parks and Trails of Saint Paul and Ramsey County Hamline Midway Coalition Historic Irvine Park Association The Ross Group Saint Anthony Park Community Council Scenic Minnesota Scenic Saint Paul University United West Seventh/Fort Road Federation == From: John Mannillo <john [at] mannillowomack.com> We have four additional co-hosts: Friends of the Mississippi River Saint Paul Parks Conservancy Macalester Groveland Community Council (D 14) West Side Community Council (D 3) --------6 of 11-------- From: Women Against Military Madness <wamm [at] mtn.org> Subject: Citizen video 1.21 12noon Brown Bag Lunch with "The Uptake" Co-Founder Chuck Olson Wednesday, January 21, Noon East Lake Public Library, 2727 East Lake Street, Minneapolis. Chuck Olsen is a cofounder of "The Uptake," a non-profit dedicated to training and distributing the work of video- based citizen journalists - and source of some of the best news coverage of the 2008 RNC protests. He is also the founder of "Minnesota Stories," called one of the best videoblogs by the New York Times. He is the producer-director of "Blogumentary," the first documentary film about the rise of political and personal blogs. His work has screened at the Walker Art Center, Get Reel Documentary Film Festival, Harvard University, and on renegade laptops all around the world. He is the Minneapolis correspondent for "Rocketboom" and works as a freelance producer, videographer, editor and educator. Sponsored by: the Twin Cities Media Alliance. Endorsed by: WAMM. --------7 of 11-------- From: Stefanie Levi <stefalala [at] yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Econmelt 1.21 6pm [economic meltdown] The January ECAG Organizing Meeting will be on Wednesday the 21st, starting at 6:00 p. m., in the Walker Community Methodist Church basement. Walker Church is located on the corner of 16th Avenue South and 31st Street in Minneapolis. Accessibility elevator is located on the 31st Street side of the building; there's a blue awning over the door there. --------8 of 11-------- From: Michelle Gross <mgresist [at] visi.com> Subject: RNC 8 fundraiser 1.21 7pm RNC 8 FUNDRAISER Wednesday, January 21 7:00 p.m. Black Dog Cafe, 308 Prince St, St. Paul As part of the ongoing Looking Back, Moving Forward photographic exhibit of RNC images, there will be a fundraiser for the RNC 8, our brothers and sisters who face serious charges just for organizing dissent. Musical entertainment includes Junkyard Empire and Pockets of Resistance. Come see the great photos--including some contributed by CUAPB copwatchers--then stay for a great meal and great music. All ages. No cover but donations welcome. --------9 of 11-------- "This Land Is Your Land" Like Woody Wrote It by: Tommy Stevenson, Tuscaloosa News (AL) Sunday 18 January 2009 http://blogs.tuscaloosanews.com/default.asp?item=2317698 From: moderator [at] PORTSIDE.ORG Bee Branch - At the conclusion of today's concert for president-elect Barack Obama 89-year-old Pete Seeger joined Bruce Springsteen for a sing-along with perhaps half a million people of Woody Guthrie's "This Land Is Your Land," which I dare say practically everyone in the country knows from childhood. But sly old Pete, who actually hoboed with Woody during the Depression and Dust Bowl, had the crowd sing the song as it was actually written, as not only a celebration of this great land, but as a demand for workers' and people's rights. That is, he restored the verses that have been censored from the song over the years to make it less political: There was a big high wall there that tried to stop me; Sign was painted, it said private property; But on the back side it didn't say nothing; That side was made for you and me. In the shadow of the steeple I saw my people, By the relief office I seen my people; As they stood there hungry, I stood there asking Is this land made for you and me? Nobody living can ever stop me, As I go walking that freedom highway; Nobody living can ever make me turn back This land was made for you and me. The "relief office," of course, refers to the ad hoc soup bowls and such set up during the Depression before the New Deal began to get the social security net we have all depended upon since the 1930s in place. Seeger, like Guthrie, has been a controversial figure at times during his life, questioned by the witch hunting committees of Congress in the 1950s, black listed, and even banded from television as late as the late 1960s. But while he hasn't got much of a voice left anymore and did not attempt to play his banjo today, it was wonderful to see the gleam in his subversive eye as he did his call and response with the throngs in front of the Lincoln Memorial. Somewhere Woody - and Leadbelly, and Sonny and Cisco and the rest of the great balladeers of that bygone era - are smiling tonight. ----- Full Lyrics This Land Is Your Land Words and Music by Woody Guthrie Chorus: This land is your land, this land is my land From California, to the New York Island From the redwood forest, to the gulf stream waters This land was made for you and me As I was walking a ribbon of highway I saw above me an endless skyway I saw below me a golden valley This land was made for you and me Chorus I've roamed and rambled and I've followed my footsteps To the sparkling sands of her diamond deserts And all around me a voice was sounding This land was made for you and me Chorus The sun comes shining as I was strolling The wheat fields waving and the dust clouds rolling The fog was lifting a voice come chanting This land was made for you and me Chorus As I was walkin' - I saw a sign there And that sign said - no tress passin' But on the other side .... it didn't say nothin! Now that side was made for you and me! Chorus In the squares of the city - In the shadow of the steeple Near the relief office - I see my people And some are grumblin' and some are wonderin' If this land's still made for you and me. Chorus (2x) [Our masters censor what they don't like. It helps put themselves up, and us down. Why do we put up with it? -ed] --------10 of 11-------- Capitalism's Self-inflicted Apocalypse By Michael Parenti January, 19 2009 ZNet After the overthrow of communist governments in Eastern Europe, capitalism was paraded as the indomitable system that brings prosperity and democracy, the system that would prevail unto the end of history. The present economic crisis, however, has convinced even some prominent free-marketeers that something is gravely amiss. Truth be told, capitalism has yet to come to terms with several historical forces that cause it endless trouble: democracy, prosperity, and capitalism itself, the very entities that capitalist rulers claim to be fostering. Plutocracy vs. Democracy Let us consider democracy first. In the United States we hear that capitalism is wedded to democracy, hence the phrase, "capitalist democracies." In fact, throughout our history there has been a largely antagonistic relationship between democracy and capital concentration. Some eighty years ago Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis commented, "We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." Moneyed interests have been opponents not proponents of democracy. The Constitution itself was fashioned by affluent gentlemen who gathered in Philadelphia in 1787 to repeatedly warn of the baneful and dangerous leveling effects of democracy. The document they cobbled together was far from democratic, being shackled with checks, vetoes, and requirements for artificial super majorities, a system designed to blunt the impact of popular demands. In the early days of the Republic the rich and well-born imposed property qualifications for voting and officeholding. They opposed the direct election of candidates (note, their Electoral College is still with us). And for decades they resisted extending the franchise to less favored groups such as propertyless working men, immigrants, racial minorities, and women. Today conservative forces continue to reject more equitable electoral features such as proportional representation, instant runoff, and publicly funded campaigns. They continue to create barriers to voting, be it through overly severe registration requirements, voter roll purges, inadequate polling accommodations, and electronic voting machines that consistently "malfunction" to the benefit of the more conservative candidates. At times ruling interests have suppressed radical publications and public protests, resorting to police raids, arrests, and jailings - applied most recently with full force against demonstrators in St. Paul, Minnesota, during the 2008 Republican National Convention. The conservative plutocracy also seeks to rollback democracy's social gains, such as public education, affordable housing, health care, collective bargaining, a living wage, safe work conditions, a non-toxic sustainable environment; the right to privacy, the separation of church and state, freedom from compulsory pregnancy, and the right to marry any consenting adult of one's own choosing. About a century ago, US labor leader Eugene Victor Debs was thrown into jail during a strike. Sitting in his cell he could not escape the conclusion that in disputes between two private interests, capital and labor, the state was not a neutral arbiter. The force of the state - with its police, militia, courts, and laws - was unequivocally on the side of the company bosses. From this, Debs concluded that capitalism was not just an economic system but an entire social order, one that rigged the rules of democracy to favor the moneybags. Capitalist rulers continue to pose as the progenitors of democracy even as they subvert it, not only at home but throughout Latin America, Africa, Asia, and the Middle East. Any nation that is not "investor friendly," that attempts to use its land, labor, capital, natural resources, and markets in a self-developing manner, outside the dominion of transnational corporate hegemony, runs the risk of being demonized and targeted as "a threat to U.S. national security." Democracy becomes a problem for corporate America not when it fails to work but when it works too well, helping the populace move toward a more equitable and livable social order, narrowing the gap, however modestly, between the superrich and the rest of us. So democracy must be diluted and subverted, smothered with disinformation, media puffery, and mountains of campaign costs; with rigged electoral contests and partially disfranchised publics, bringing faux victories to more or less politically safe major-party candidates. Capitalism vs. Prosperity The corporate capitalists no more encourage prosperity than do they propagate democracy. Most of the world is capitalist, and most of the world is neither prosperous nor particularly democratic. One need only think of capitalist Nigeria, capitalist Indonesia, capitalist Thailand, capitalist Haiti, capitalist Colombia, capitalist Pakistan, capitalist South Africa, capitalist Latvia, and various other members of the Free World - more accurately, the Free Market World. A prosperous, politically literate populace with high expectations about its standard of living and a keen sense of entitlement, pushing for continually better social conditions, is not the plutocracy's notion of an ideal workforce and a properly pliant polity. Corporate investors prefer poor populations. The poorer you are, the harder you will work - for less. The poorer you are, the less equipped you are to defend yourself against the abuses of wealth. In the corporate world of "free-trade," the number of billionaires is increasing faster than ever while the number of people living in poverty is growing at a faster rate than the world's population. Poverty spreads as wealth accumulates. Consider the United States. In the last eight years alone, while vast fortunes accrued at record rates, an additional six million Americans sank below the poverty level; median family income declined by over $2,000; consumer debt more than doubled; over seven million Americans lost their health insurance, and more than four million lost their pensions; meanwhile homelessness increased and housing foreclosures reached pandemic levels. It is only in countries where capitalism has been reined in to some degree by social democracy that the populace has been able to secure a measure of prosperity; northern European nations such as Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark come to mind. But even in these social democracies popular gains are always at risk of being rolled back. It is ironic to credit capitalism with the genius of economic prosperity when most attempts at material betterment have been vehemently and sometimes violently resisted by the capitalist class. The history of labor struggle provides endless illustration of this. To the extent that life is bearable under the present U.S. economic order, it is because millions of people have waged bitter class struggles to advance their living standards and their rights as citizens, bringing some measure of humanity to an otherwise heartless politico-economic order. A Self-devouring Beast The capitalist state has two roles long recognized by political thinkers. First, like any state it must provide services that cannot be reliably developed through private means, such as public safety and orderly traffic. Second, the capitalist state protects the haves from the have-nots, securing the process of capital accumulation to benefit the moneyed interests, while heavily circumscribing the demands of the working populace, as Debs observed from his jail cell. There is a third function of the capitalist state seldom mentioned. It consists of preventing the capitalist system from devouring itself. Consider the core contradiction Karl Marx pointed to: the tendency toward overproduction and market crisis. An economy dedicated to speedups and wage cuts, to making workers produce more and more for less and less, is always in danger of a crash. To maximize profits, wages must be kept down. But someone has to buy the goods and services being produced. For that, wages must be kept up. There is a chronic tendency - as we are seeing today - toward overproduction of private sector goods and services and underconsumption of necessities by the working populace. In addition, there is the frequently overlooked self-destruction created by the moneyed players themselves. If left completely unsupervised, the more active command component of the financial system begins to devour less organized sources of wealth. Instead of trying to make money by the arduous task of producing and marketing goods and services, the marauders tap directly into the money streams of the economy itself. During the 1990s we witnessed the collapse of an entire economy in Argentina when unchecked free marketeers stripped enterprises, pocketed vast sums, and left the country's productive capacity in shambles. The Argentine state, gorged on a heavy diet of free-market ideology, faltered in its function of saving capitalism from the capitalists. Some years later, in the United States, came the multi-billion-dollar plunder perpetrated by corporate conspirators at Enron, WorldCom, Harkin, Adelphia, and a dozen other major companies. Inside players like Ken Lay turned successful corporate enterprises into sheer wreckage, wiping out the jobs and life savings of thousands of employees in order to pocket billions. These thieves were caught and convicted. Does that not show capitalism's self-correcting capacity? Not really. The prosecution of such malfeasance - in any case coming too late - was a product of democracy's accountability and transparency, not capitalism's. Of itself the free market is an amoral system, with no strictures save caveat emptor. In the meltdown of 2008-09 the mounting financial surplus created a problem for the moneyed class: there were not enough opportunities to invest. With more money than they knew what to do with, big investors poured immense sums into nonexistent housing markets and other dodgy ventures, a legerdemain of hedge funds, derivatives, high leveraging, credit default swaps, predatory lending, and whatever else. Among the victims were other capitalists, small investors, and the many workers who lost billions of dollars in savings and pensions. Perhaps the premiere brigand was Bernard Madoff. Described as "a longstanding leader in the financial services industry," Madoff ran a fraudulent fund that raked in $50 billion from wealthy investors, paying them back "with money that wasn't there," as he himself put it. The plutocracy devours its own children. In the midst of the meltdown, at an October 2008 congressional hearing, former chair of the Federal Reserve and orthodox free-market devotee Alan Greenspan confessed that he had been mistaken to expect moneyed interests - groaning under an immense accumulation of capital that needs to be invested somewhere - to suddenly exercise self-restraint. The classic laissez-faire theory is even more preposterous than Greenspan made it. In fact, the theory claims that everyone should pursue their own selfish interests without restraint. This unbridled competition supposedly will produce maximum benefits for all because the free market is governed by a miraculously benign "invisible hand" that optimizes collective outputs. ("Greed is good.") Is the crisis of 2008-09 caused by a chronic tendency toward overproduction and hyper-financial accumulation, as Marx would have it? Or is it the outcome of the personal avarice of people like Bernard Madoff? In other words, is the problem systemic or individual? In fact, the two are not mutually exclusive. Capitalism breeds the venal perpetrators, and rewards the most unscrupulous among them. The crimes and crises are not irrational departures from a rational system, but the converse: they are the rational outcomes of a basically irrational and amoral system. Worse still, the ensuing multi-billion dollar government bailouts are themselves being turned into an opportunity for pillage. Not only does the state fail to regulate, it becomes itself a source of plunder, pulling vast sums from the federal money machine, leaving the taxpayers to bleed. Those who scold us for "running to the government for a handout" are themselves running to the government for a handout. Corporate America has always enjoyed grants-in-aid, loan guarantees, and other state and federal subventions. But the 2008-09 "rescue operation" offered a record feed at the public trough. More than $350 billion was dished out by a right-wing lame-duck Secretary of the Treasury to the biggest banks and financial houses without oversight - not to mention the more than $4 trillion that has come from the Federal Reserve. Most of the banks, including JPMorgan Chase and Bank of New York Mellon, stated that they had no intention of letting anyone know where the money was going. The big bankers used some of the bailout, we do know, to buy up smaller banks and prop up banks overseas. CEOs and other top banking executives are spending bailout funds on fabulous bonuses and lavish corporate spa retreats. Meanwhile, big bailout beneficiaries like Citigroup and Bank of America laid off tens of thousands of employees, inviting the question: why were they given all that money in the first place? While hundreds of billions were being doled out to the very people who had caused the catastrophe, the housing market continued to wilt, credit remained paralyzed, unemployment worsened, and consumer spending sank to record lows. In sum, free-market corporate capitalism is by its nature a disaster waiting to happen. Its essence is the transformation of living nature into mountains of commodities and commodities into heaps of dead capital. When left entirely to its own devices, capitalism foists its diseconomies and toxicity upon the general public and upon the natural environment - and eventually begins to devour itself. The immense inequality in economic power that exists in our capitalist society translates into a formidable inequality of political power, which makes it all the more difficult to impose democratic regulations. If the paladins of Corporate America want to know what really threatens "our way of life," it is their way of life, their boundless way of pilfering their own system, destroying the very foundation on which they stand, the very community on which they so lavishly feed. Michael Parenti's recent books include: Contrary Notions: The Michael Parenti Reader (City Lights); Democracy for the Few, 8th ed. (Wadsworth); and God and His Demons (forthcoming). For further information, visit his website: www.michaelparenti.org. --------11 of 11-------- >From South Africa to Israel Time for a New Divestment Campaign By KEVIN ALEXANDER GRAY CounterPunch January 19, 2009 Barack Obama's inauguration coming as we celebrate of Martin Luther King Day predictably draws linkages between the two. Many use Obama's election to claim a realization of the "dream". Others mumble something about a post-racial America. I suspect that King, if alive, would reject such nonsense. Although when asked "who he thought King would support" in the 2008 primary campaign Obama made a good case for answering "Nobody," it is possible that King may have supported Obama. King was a politician of sorts, although not so much at the time of his assassination. We love King now, but at the end of his life he wasn't so popular. Younger activists criticized him and called him names such as "Da Lord" - mocking his once high place in civil rights politics. President Lyndon B. Johnson and a host of government officials, local and national, condemned him when he spoke out against the Vietnam War. King was not universally cheered when he marched, to his death, with the garbage workers in Memphis striking for fair wages and respect. Truth be told, he was jeered, even by some blacks. Sure, we love King now, but there was a time when people turned their back on him and his message. It has always been troubling to witness King's mission and message reduced to "I have a dream" in the popular culture. It's taught to kids in kindergarten, and they carry it with them all their lives. But all dreams are not equal. They can be interpreted in a number of ways. And some dreams are nightmares, or turn into nightmares for other people. Before it became a "quagmire" the war in Vietnam was a dream of the American political establishment. Exactly one year before his assassination, King, setting aside the grave danger it brought to him, challenged his government and broke with American imperial policy. At New York City's Riverside Church on April 4, 1967, King linked the domestic exploitation of African Americans with "the deadly Western arrogance that has poisoned the international atmosphere for so long." In his speech, "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence., King said, "A time comes when silence is betrayal..," And, "I knew that I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today - my own government." King's charge is just as true today as it was 40-plus years ago. America is still the greatest purveyor of violence in the world. Silence is still betrayal. But let's take it a step beyond silence. Non-action is the other betrayal. Change isn't just about an election in November and a celebration in January. It's about doing something measurable to usher in a more peaceful world. Sure it's good to change one's perspective and way of looking at things. But the trick is to make your actions match what's on your mind. There is an arc. People and events are linked on the arc. So, this year we should honor King in an active sense. We should commit ourselves to organize against the American policy of violence and empire. The anti-war movement should apply pressure on Obama to withdraw from Iraq and Afghanistan. And, just as important, particularly amid the horror that has been visited on the people of Gaza; a broader peace movement must also build real economic and political pressure against Israel's immoral and criminal acts against the Palestinians. This King Day should mark the beginning of an organized push for American divestment from Israel. When you think about it, US foreign policy toward Palestine has been a segregationist or apartheid policy. In his 2006 book Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, former President Jimmy Carter likened Israel's occupation of Palestinian land and its repression of Palestinian people, both within Israel and in the occupied territories, to the state of apartheid, which existed in South Africa prior to the early 1990s. Apartheid means "separateness". And there is little debate that Zionism, the official ideology of Israel, is predicated on religious and ethnic separation or segregation. A self-described Jewish state - that is, a state that operates of, by and on behalf of a single group of people - cannot also be a secular, democratic state where persons of all religious and ethnic backgrounds are treated equally. A Jewish state that has never declared its borders, that has annexed and occupied territories, flouting international law and subjecting the indigenous population to poverty, indignity, theft, torture and death, is not only a colonialist outlaw state; it is also racist. As one Palestinian gentleman remarked to me, "While blacks in America were once considered subhuman, Palestinians are not considered humans at all." And Israel could not have pursued any of these policies without the steadfast financial and political support of the United States. It is no secret that Israel is the largest recipient of U.S. aid in the world. It receives more than $15 million every day from the United States, or $30 billion a year by most estimates. The F-16 fighter jets and Apache helicopters that have dropped hundreds of tons of bombs and missiles on Gaza are made in the United States and provided to the Israeli government. Every American taxpayer underwrites Israeli-style apartheid. Divestment may be at odds with the position of many elected black leaders (the Congressional Black Caucus included), but it's not at odds with what King spoke of and died for. It is not at odds with those he championed. He championed the locked out and oppressed. Throughout my life, black politics has lined up with oppressed people in other nations. Malcolm X stood with Fidel Castro and the Cuban people following the 1958 ouster of US-backed dictator Fulgencio Batista, and with him the organized crime and American corporatist mobsters who exploited the Cuban people. Harlemites greeted Castro with affection as they gathered to welcome him during his stay at the Hotel Theresa in 1960 because he wanted to be "among the workers". Muhammad Ali is a "national treasure" now. But he wasn't when he dropped the name Cassius Clay and said "Ain't no Vietnamese ever called me nigger". Americans love Nelson Mandela, now. But he was a "terrorist" while he was heading "Spear of the Nation" - the armed wing of the African National Congress. That's why he was locked up at Robben Island. Mandela's name was only recently - during the 2nd part of the Bush Administration - removed from the State Department's "terrorists list". In the days of Ronald Reagan it was America and Israel that supported South Africa when the rest of the world said "enough". But black Americans remembered the hundreds of kids who died in Sharpesville Massacre in the 60s. We were in solidarity with those who took part in the Soweto uprising of 1976. We cried and protested when the South African police killed Steve Biko in 1977. What's happening in Palestine is not fundamentally different from what occurred in apartheid South Africa. Kids are being killed. People have been herded into the (more deadly) equivalent of bantustans. Political leaders are targeted for assassination. Most recently Hamas Interior Minister Said Siam was killed along with nine others, when Israeli warplanes bombed a home in the Jabalya refugee camp. Israel's behavior demands the same response from the world human rights community as was mustered against South Africa. The facts are clear. The citizens of Gaza live in a virtual prison. They are surrounded by water, walls, fences and watch/gun towers. In the latest assault, at least 1,133 Palestinians have been killed, including 346 children and 105 women; at least 5,200 have been injured. People talk about "suffering on both sides," but there is no proportion in weaponry or force, which is why 100 Palestinians have died for every one Israeli. The Palestinian people live under Israel's apartheid blockade where even humanitarian aid is not allowed through - where citizens can get food, medicine and even goats, in addition to guns and weapons, only through tunnels. Not just in Gaza but throughout all the occupied territories, Palestinian water rights along with their land and human rights have been stolen. Fundamentalist Jewish immigrants from Brooklyn have automatic citizenship and automatic civil and property rights, while the indigenous Palestinians lose and lose some more. Most often, it is Palestinian land that the migrants have settled on, with the blessings of Israel and the financial support of the United States via the Israeli government - in the face of international and United Nations' resolutions against such settlements. It is Palestinian land, stolen for Israeli settlements, that the Palestinians have been firing mortars onto; Palestinian land that is bisected by Israeli-only roads and a wall that exceeds the Berlin Wall in size and cruelty. (No German had his farm or homestead cut in two by the wall.) They are Palestinian orchards that have been bulldozed; Palestinian homes that have been demolished; and American-made bulldozers that have done the job. A Caterpillar bulldozer crushed 23-year-old American peace activist Rachel Corrie to death when she stood in front of a doctor's house in Gaza trying to prevent its demolition on March 16, 2003. And the same bulldozers have taken everything from Palestinian families year after year for decades. Throughout the latest assault on Gaza, those blindly supportive of Israel raise a straw man argument asking, "Who struck the blow?" Or, "Fired the first shot?" Or, "Launched the first mortar". Their answer to the question is almost always certain to be, "Hamas." Before the days Hamas came to power, the same straw man was raised and knocked down as the answer back then was sure to be, "Fatah" - led by PLO leader Yasser Arafat. Supporters of Israel never mention the blockade on Gaza or political assassinations or the wall or the poverty and despair. Instead, they label Hamas or anyone opposing occupation as "terrorists" and lamely apologize for the civilians killed calling them "collateral damage," or they claim that the women and children killed in the school or hospital or UN facilities were "being used as human shield". No one calls the Jewish settlers human shields, though their incursions into occupied territory has been both a provocation and an excuse since 1967. Just take a look at a map of the territory lost by the Palestinian people since 1948 and at an inexorable pace since 1967. Then answer the question, "Who stuck the first blow?" Throughout the latest attack on the Palestinian people I have heard a few people openly make the bloodthirsty suggestion that "they (the Israelis) should kill them all". But the most common thing one hears is something similar to what Obama said on a visit to Israel in the summer 2008 that "If somebody shot rockets at my house where my two daughters were sleeping at night, I'd do everything in my power to stop them". The new president's comment was one of the first things that came out the mouths of various spokespersons for the Israeli government as the Christmastime onslaught on Gaza began. But what of the Israeli rockets and bombs and bullets and bulldozers that for years have hit the homes where Palestinian children were sleeping? Now Israel has called a cease fire in Gaza, if only for a moment. Still, we must organize and protest in an effective way beyond the moment. We have our work cut out for us. The Palestinians have few friends in high places. By a vote of 404-1 the House recently signaled its support for Israel's apartheid regime and literally condemned the Palestinians right of self-defense. The only member of Congress to take a stand with the Palestinians was and is Ohio's Dennis Kucinich. On the campaign trail at a conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Obama declared himself a "Zionist," and upon being elected chose Rahm Emanuel, a dual citizen of the US and Israel, as his chief of staff. The Israeli paper Ha'aretz (6 Nov. 2008) said it all: Obama's first pick: Israeli Rahm Emanuel as chief of staff. Some say that Emanuel "has a track record on Israel well to the right of George Bush". This includes signing a 2003 letter justifying Israel's policy of political assassinations and criticizing George Bush for not supporting Israel enough. Emanuel backed a resolution supporting Israel's bombing of Lebanon in the summer of 2006 and he called on the US government to cancel a planned speech to Congress by Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki because he had condemned Israel's actions in Lebanon. As president, where will Obama stand? More important, what is the moral stand, and what must we do to press the government to take it? First, we must see Israel with the same eyes as we saw South Africa in the apartheid years - as a racist nation deserving of international isolation and sanctions. Second, we must demand that the United States end its $30 billion a year military support to the country. Third, we should organize, confront and demand that public bodies such as universities, local and state governments divest their portfolios from companies that do business in or with Israel. Fourth, we should identify and boycott those companies that do business with and in Israel. Fifth, we should call for a cultural boycott of Israel, and boycott those artists who perform in the country. As for the new president we should continue to pressure him (1) to establish a fair involvement with the disputing parties, recognizing their equal humanity, not take the one-sided, Israel-first position of his predecessors; (2) to pressure the Israeli government to allow unimpeded access of humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip; (3) to call for an investigation into Israel's misuse of U.S. weapons, to include the use of white phosphorous and urge the UN weapons inspectors to determine if Israel is using depleted uranium-tipped missiles on the Palestinians. This would be a first step toward ending arms transfers to Israel. All people have a right to exist - Jews and Palestinians. The way to peace is for each side to respect the other's right to live. But America must be a fair player in what is now a continual catastrophe with our country on the wrong side of history. We must remember that "where you spend your money is a political act". Putting pressure on business and government is a means to force change. By "getting in their pockets' we can say no to the violence. We can say, "Not in our names". That's what I think Dr. King would say and do at a time like this. Almost 40 years ago, Martin Luther King warned that "the problem of racism, the problem of economic exploitation, and the problem of war are all tied together. These are the triple evils that are interrelated." Those "triple evils" of racism, economic injustice and militarism are what we must fight - the dream of King's was the defeat of the "triple evils". As we celebrate his day, let's do it in solidarity with the dispossessed. As Vice-President Joe Biden was saying his farewell to the Senate he quoted King saying, "The arc of the moral universe is long but it bends toward justice". I believe Biden is right as King was right. But there's a strong magnetic pull that has the needle still pointed on injustice. The injustice of being the "greatest purveyor of violence in the world". We can help move the needle toward just by insisting that our country sees a Palestinian life having as much value as an Israeli life. Kevin Alexander Gray is a civil rights organizer in South Carolina. His book, Waiting for Lightning to Strike, has just been published by CounterPunch/AK Press. He can be reached at: kagamba [at] bellsouth.net --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - David Shove shove001 [at] tc.umn.edu rhymes with clove Progressive Calendar over 2225 subscribers as of 12.19.02 please send all messages in plain text no attachments vote third party for president for congress now and forever Socialism YES Capitalism NO To GO DIRECTLY to an item, eg --------8 of x-------- do a find on --8
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.